Hungary: post-race analysis 2017
Overnight a thought
struck me: what if Kvyat and Vandoorne’s odds were the wrong way
round. This morning the group C market had been taken down by
Ladbrokes. I checked the bet and, as of 7.30am (give or take) the bet
remained open, at the odds I’d tipped.
The race had little
passing but a lot of tension and was eminently enjoyable, as a
spectator, for that reason. The bets were dire, as I’ll discuss
below. One-third foolish misjudgement, two-thirds terrible luck.
Off the line it was
formation flying at the sharp end. Then Verstappen cocked up and went
wide, Ricciardo passed him, the Dutchman locked a brake and struck
his team mate, putting the Aussie out of the race, bringing out a
safety car, and (after an investigation) getting Verstappen a 10s
time penalty, which he served at his pit stop.
First time there’s
ever been a safety car on lap one.
Sainz had made an
annoyingly good start and was ahead of Vandoorne by a couple of
places.
When the safety car
buggered off the Ferraris scampered into the distance, clearly faster
than Mercedes and with Raikkonen sticking with Vettel very nicely.
There was only one pit
stop each, almost everyone going from supersoft to soft. However,
late into the first stint Vettel had steering problems (he had to
steer to the left to go in a straight line). Raikkonen was catching
him. After the first round of pit stops the German narrowly retained
the lead over his team mate, but with the two Mercedes catching up.
Raikkonen clearly
wanted to be let past (and was obviously faster). Ferrari prioritised
the title over the race and kept them as they are. It was to prove a
canny (or cynical, as you like) call. Meanwhile, Mercedes yielded to
Hamilton’s pleas and let him past Bottas to have a crack at
Raikkonen, on condition that he swapped back if he couldn’t pass
the Ferrari.
But it's very hard to pass at Hungary due to the nature of the circuit (turbulent air). Hamilton was faster than bottled-up Raikkonen (in turn, faster than Vettel but forbidden to try passing him), but the Briton couldn't effect a pass.
Verstappen, in 5th,
was catching Bottas at a rate of knots, but the Mercedes drivers
skilfully managed to swap positions just before the line. Interesting
contrast of team styles, and to note that Bottas is held in more
equal esteem at Mercedes than Raikkonen at Ferrari (although the
points situation is drastically different).
Vettel got the win,
Raikkonen 2nd, then Bottas. Hamilton and Verstappen were
4th and 5th. Hamilton swapping back lost him 3
more points to Vettel. Alonso was 6th, a great result for
McLaren who have looked strong all weekend (Vandoorne finished 10th
for their first double points finish of the year).
Sainz was 7th,
the rotter, Perez and Ocon 8th and 9th despite
their poor qualifying. Grosjean, Di Resta and Hulkenberg all retired,
Grosjean due to a cross-threaded wheel nut in his pit stop (which was
itself early because of a slow puncture).
Got to say I’m pretty
aggravated by the Vandoorne tip. Losing out at the start was
unfortunate, but these things happen. But for Sainz not to get a
penalty [for driving Alonso wide, though I haven’t seen the
incident with my own eyes] when Magnussen and Verstappen did
(particularly the latter, who collided with his team mate on the
first lap) sticks in my craw. It was a good value bet, and it
should’ve come off. Maybe it’s my own fault. I did consider
backing Sainz as well. But Vandoorne should’ve won. …
The Bottas bet was a
clear misjudgement. As for No Safety Car, it was the first time
there’s ever been one on lap one. Another significant stroke of bad
luck.
All in all, a pretty
bloody horrendous race. I screwed up on Bottas (my own fault,
especially given I knew it’d be a better circuit for the other top
teams), but the two other bets were damned unlucky.
I did enjoy the race in
sheer sporting terms and it’s set up the rest of the season (after
a long break) nicely, but, from a betting perspective, almost
everything that could go wrong did go wrong. These things do happen
(and other days I’ve had flukes) but it’s never pleasant.
On a less grumbly note,
Mr. M suggested a midfielder for fastest lap, and, whilst I disagreed
with Perez, Alonso did get it. Not sure what the odds were on that
but 50/1 or longer seems eminently possible. I didn’t back it
myself, alas, but a clever thought nevertheless. (He also picked
Ricciardo as both a DNF and first DNF. I was tempted by the former
but considered it too much of a pot luck bet, but that shows what I
know).
Anyway, to the title
standings:
Vettel 202
Hamilton 188
Bottas 169
Still a three horse
race. Bottas needs to close the gap or he’ll be have to become a
rear gunner and abandon his title hopes. The next two races (Belgium
and Italy) will suit Mercedes, especially the latter. After that is
Singapore, which will be more difficult for them.
Constructors:
Mercedes 357
Ferrari 318
Red Bull 184
Force India 101
Williams 41
Toro Rosso 39
Haas 29
Renault 26
McLaren 11
Sauber 5
Ferrari take a chunk
out of Mercedes’ lead but I think the top four are likely to finish
in that order. Meanwhile, tighter in the midfield. McLaren have leapt
off the bottom sport and consigned Sauber to the foot of the table.
Sometimes you win
undeservedly due to good luck (once I backed Perez to be top 6
without realising his good odds were due to a penalty, and then he
actually achieved it), and sometimes Satan urinates in your kettle.
Today was an example of the latter, but I’ve had some good fortune
in the past and there are nine races left, so hopefully there’ll be
some better results ahead.
It’s four weeks until
the Belgian Grand Prix.
Morris Dancer
Many thanks yet again Mr Dancer for an excellent write-up of the race. And many thanks for kindly mentioning my tip.
ReplyDeleteThere is a rather tedious chap on another betting website we patronise who keeps repeating that "nobody on here ever seems to lose" as though we are all a bunch of tinkers.
As I countered on that site, I enjoy offering my ideas here in advance alongside yours and, like you, when I've done so I always post my results too.
I must say that this was my best result for a long time - and I enjoyed cheering for the fastest lap as much as if I'd actually won the bet.
WINNING
Points Finish – Stoffel Vandoorne @ 4/7
Race Winner – Sebastian Vettel @ 4/9
Not To Complete The Race – Daniel Ricciardo @ 10/3
First Retirement Of Race – Daniel Ricciardo @ 16/1
LOST
Fastest Lap – Sergio Perez @ 50/1
That's a cracking set of results. I wouldn't've backed Vettel at those odds, or Vandoorne for points, given DNF rates etc, but the Ricciardo tips are very tasty. [I did tip Vettel numerous times elsewhere, at odds from 4 to 6].
ReplyDeleteIndeed. This blog is evidence of many losses :p
I am curious what odds Alonso was for fastest lap.